CEO 74-2 -- September 3, 1974
To: Leonard H. Smith, Jr., Candidate for Largo City Commission, Clearwater
Prepared by: Patricia Butler
SUMMARY:
Under
the provisions of the financial disclosure law, Ch. 74-177, Laws of Florida,
candidates for public office must list total assets excluding any asset having
a value equal to or less than 15 percent of the total.
Jointly held property is an asset and must be included in the computation
of total assets. The amount to be
included in the gross computation should be the percentage of value of the
jointly held property equal to the percentage of the officer's joint ownership.
Joint property must be listed as an asset in the statement of disclosure
if, after computation of gross assets, the property has a value greater than
15 percent of the total value of the candidate's assets.
The types of disclosure sought by CE Forms 2 and 3 are affirmative
in nature. Therefore, if the answers
to all statutorily required information would be "none" or "not
applicable"
QUESTIONS:
1.
2. Must CE Form 2, Quarterly Statement of Disclosure of Clients Represented Before Agencies, and CE Form 3, Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest by Public Officers, Public Employees, and Candidates, be filed if the answers to all statutorily required information would be "none" or "not applicable"
Your
question 1 is answered in the affirmative.
A list of the total assets of each public officer or candidate, listed in order of size, excluding any asset which is equal to or less than fifteen percent of the total; any real property not situate in Florida and the personal residence and recreational or vacation homes of each public officer or candidate shall be excluded from the list. Each listed asset shall be identified only by type, location, address or legal description.
Since
jointly held property is clearly an asset of the joint owner, it is the opinion
of the Ethics Commission that jointly held properties are to be included in
the computation of the total assets of the candidate or public officer.
The value to be included in this computation should not be the total
value of the property, however, since the extent of the asset must be measured
by the extent of the joint ownership. Thus,
the amount to be included in computing gross assets is the percentage of the
value of the jointly held property equal to the percentage of the officer's
joint ownership. The only purpose
for computing the value of your total assets is to enable you to determine
which of your assets have a value which exceeds 15 percent of this total --
you do not have to list the value of any asset or your total assets.
Your question 2 is answered in the negative. The Ethics Commission is of the opinion that a purely negative report is not to be filed on CE Forms 2 and 3. The type of disclosure sought by these forms is positive or affirmative in nature.